[人民日报记者]:总理您好，我是人民日报记者。两会期间，我们人民日报下属的人民网和其它十多家网站都做了“两会关注热点”或者“我有问题问总理”的网上调查。参与网民达数千万，提出的问题超过百万，成为公民有序参与的一条重要途径。大家关注度最高 的是物价问题。您在报告中提出，今年物价增幅控制在4.8%，请问总理，新一届政府将采取哪些措施确保实现这个目标？谢谢。
================================
[法新社记者]:现在我想在座的很多人都希望能够去拉%萨￥自己亲眼看一看到底那里发生了什么。现在不允许外国人前往^西#藏%，而且有一些在￥西&藏#的外国人已 经被逐出了西藏。所以我们特别希望能够有独立的媒体或者独立的人士去拉萨，现场评估当地发生的一切。对这样的呼声，总理您有何评论？做何反应？我们想知道如果中方对自己所提供的事实真相如此有信心，为什么不允许外国或者&独(立@人士前往&西%藏$？
本想完全贴上来的，但由于敏感关键字太多，会被屏蔽，只贴上部分，完全版请看此处
人家还要(相关)>>> |
这个就是御用文人和耿介之士的区别
日人民报，爆日人民
老美写的一段，很到点子上。希望贵博的方向是“理性与事实”，而不是“反共”。
Who are the best friends of the Chinese Communist Party?
They are Western media such as CNN and Western politicians such as Ms. Pelosi.
The negative, one sided, and often Penthouse style “hard porn” sort of reports about China in the West easily offends a Chinese person. These reports make an average Chinese believe what Beijing told him or her that the West means harm to China just like the West has been in the past several hundred years. The strong nationalist feeling of many Chinese “inspired” and ’strengthened” by the clumsy new coverage of Western media helps Beijing to rule this huge nation more effectively and more easily. Alas, outstanding editors, writers, and reporters with Harvard and Stanford degrees working at CCN, Time, and Washington Post! You all deserve a big medal of “outstanding communist party sympathizers” reward directly from the political bureau in Beijing!
To be fair to the media, it might be a learning that has not happened. The media may have not learned how to deal with a highly interconnected world of worldwide TV coverage and omnipresent internet presence. Their content and delivery are both intended for a local audience. The worldwide impact may well be a side effect. Before the media learns how to behave in a global media marketplace, they have to focus on their primary local market where the primary income comes from.
Western politicians also help Beijing to gain popular support in major ways. When Ms. Pelosi spoke out about violence in Tibet, did she express sadness and sympathy to the families that suffered tragic loss of lives and properties? Did she ever think about not to be offensive to 1.3 billion Chinese people while expressing her concerns over the Chinese government? Of course not, this was because her audience was those who elect her in the USA, not the Chinese people whose feeling was not really her concern. She may have a political need to show how tough she was too. However, It is too easy to say something aggressive about human rights and Tibet. It is a cheap shot and anybody can do it. Instead, it is extremely difficult to express strong concerns over human rights AND to make it clear that the USA wants to grow a constructive relationship with China and the USA respects and cares for the Chinese people. Compare her performance to what Mr. McCain said about the tragedy in Tibet and you will immediately notice the skillful balance and the political experience that Mr. McCain enjoys.
It seems that some Western politicians would rather embrace extreme approaches. They either kiss up in Beijing or make dumb remarks or dumb moves that are deeply irritating to an ordinary Chinese citizen and help to drive him or her to the tune of Beijing. For example, Ms. Pelosi’s talk about “international investigation” may be insulting to many ordinary Chinese citizens and help them believe what they read in the official Chinese paper about US hostility. Every time, a US aircraft carrier “sailed through Taiwan Strait to avoid bad weather”, millions of young Chinese people become more supportive to Beijing’s plan of military buildup.
As long as we have these super clever but very unwise politicians and strategists in DC, the Chinese Communist Party can lead the political and economic life in China forever, because our elected officials and “smart” media people are helping the Chinese Communist Party to achieve “national convergence with the central leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, especially when China is surrounded by hostile Western forces.” Maybe the CCP Central Committee is preparing a grand gala for some Western politicians and strategists as well as media gurus to thank them for their powerful and highly effective support of CCP leadership.
Why the American or Western politicians and the media do this? They are not dumb actually. The politicians do cheap shots against China to win popular support at home. The media’s goal is to say whatever people in the West want to hear to make money. They all know clearly this is bad for the people whom they are trying to serve, but they do not really care. Well, maybe they do, but serving the people would be their secondary if not tertiary priority. Power and money must be the primary objectives.
Democracy comes with a steep price. Myopic strategy and irresponsible political and military act to win popular support so as to hang on to power is one of the down-sides of representative political systems. While nothing in the world is perfect, these intrinsic flaws of Western style democracy have been proven to be costly, especially for a strong country that has a tendency of excessive reliance on military solutions
温出卖赵投靠李，狐狸的尾巴迟早会露出来的！魏君子！
你他娘的怎么知道温出卖赵？证据何在？不好红口白牙，血口喷人，我还说你妈不守妇道，你是私生子呢。
楼上说的是，说人闲话要有根据，拿出证据来。
